Type K vs Type E
Type E gives you nearly twice the signal. Type K gives you twice the range. Almost every other difference follows from those two facts.
| Type K | Type E | |
|---|---|---|
| Positive leg | NiCr10 | NiCr10 |
| Negative leg | NiSi | Constantan |
| EMF at 100 °C | ≈ 4.10 mV | ≈ 6.32 mV |
| EMF at 500 °C | ≈ 20.64 mV | ≈ 37.01 mV |
| Approx. sensitivity | ≈ 41 µV/K | ≈ 68 µV/K |
| Useful range | −200 to 1200 °C | −200 to 900 °C |
| Drift in oxidising service | Green-rot in reducing atmospheres | Better stability at low temperature |
Why type E has the bigger signal
Both types share the same positive leg. The difference is on the negative side: constantan has a much larger Seebeck coefficient against NiCr than NiSi does. That is the whole mechanism — and it is also why type E's negative leg is the same wire used as the negative leg of types J and T.
Where type K still wins
- Above 900 °C, where type E is out of its range
- Where the thermocouple must survive thermal cycling in air
- Where the installed base and the controllers already assume type K
Type K's negative leg is prone to "green rot" in reducing atmospheres and to short-range ordering effects around 250–550 °C. If your process is a vacuum furnace with a carbon environment, that is worth designing around rather than discovering.
Can I use the same constantan for type E, J and T?
Which drifts less at low temperature?
Send the specification — diameter, grade, temper, quantity.
We come back with a confirmed lead time and the documentation we can issue for the shipment. 100 g sample at cost; orders from 1 kg.
Request a quotation Order a 100 g sample